Skip to main content

Where Did Cain's Wife Come From?

Cain and Abel - A Closer look
Q: Hi. Please tell me I'm not the first one to ask this:
When Cain killed Abel and God made him move away... the scriptures make it sound like he married someone already existing and not from Adam and Eve. What is your take?


A: No, you are not the first person to ask this. In fact, this question has been raised many times. Perhaps most famously during the Scopes Trial. It was captured in this classic movie clip from the fictional reenactment of the trial called: Inherit The Wind.

No matter how many times it has been asked, it's a good question. One that Christians ought to be able to answer better than in the above clip! In fact, that embarrassing answer would have been better had it only occurred in a movie. But it didn't. I believe that our culture is still feeling the impact of poorly defended biblical truth. Especially as it relates to this realm of "Science vs. Bible."

So, you asked for my take -- here goes!

The Bible tells us some important information regarding Adam and Eve. First, Genesis 3:20,
The man named his wife Eve, because she was the mother of all the living.

According to this passage, Eve is the mother of all the living. This is translated from the Hebrew word kol which means, well, "all." Every living human being has their ancestral source in this first couple. Cain's wife, too!

This truth is reiterated in the New Testament:
From one man he made every nation of the human race to inhabit the entire earth, determining their set times and the fixed limits of the places where they would live... (Acts 17:26, NET, underline added)

So then, just as sin entered the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all people because all sinned (Romans 5:12, NET)

Adam and Eve are the source of all human beings. In all places. At all times. The population of the human race was drastically lowered at the time of the Flood. Down to 8 people. Every current living person can trace their lineage all the back to one of the 4 couples on the Ark.

So, where did Cain get his wife? She was one of the children of Adam and Eve. She was Cain's sister. Or, possibly a grandchild of Adam and Eve and thus, Cain's niece.

The way the question was asked, at least in the Scopes Trial, demonstrates a level of ignorance. From both the questioner and the answerer. They were operating on the assumption that there were just 4 people on earth at the time. Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel.

But is that what the Bible teaches?

A common interpretive problem is reading assumptions into the text. Our task as handlers of the biblical revelation, however, is not to add our assumptions in. We are to extract God's message out. That's the proper direction. That's how He intends it to be received.

So, where does the faulty assumption enter in this case? It enters when the Bible names 4 people and we add a little word with big significance. "Only." There are only 4 people. But that's not a fair assumption! And, it's not what the Bible says.

If we allow the text to speak for itself, we see in Genesis 3:20 that Eve is the mother of all the living, that Adam and Eve had two sons (at least), named Cain and Abel, and that these two grew up and entered into some semblance of a profession. Abel, a shepherd (4:2), and Cain, a farmer, (4:3). God was pleased with the offering of Abel and not Cain. Cain decided to murder his brother (4:8-9).

God's judgment upon Cain is to drive him out of the land (4:10-11). God caused him to be a homeless wanderer on the earth (4:12). So, out goes Cain into the land of Nod (in Hebrew, Nod literally means "wandering") in 4:16. Then in 4:17 there appears a new person in the narrative, Cain's wife!

Where should we suppose she came from? Should we assume, as some skeptics do, that there was another race or civilization of people who are living in the "land of wandering" east of Eden?

Or should we continue to take the details of the narrative as they've been given? The details that say this unnamed woman, who was Cain's wife, was part of "all the living" who were born to Eve just a few verses earlier?

It is not uncommon for the Scriptures to give general information with a lack of specifics about the number and names of children. Especially as it relates to women. Anyone catch the names of Ham, Shem, and Japheth's wives? How about Noah's wife?

In the general overview that we are given regarding Adam and Eve's life we are told the following:

This is the record of the family line of Adam. When God created humankind, he made them in the likeness of God. He created them male and female; when they were created, he blessed them and named them "humankind." When Adam had lived 130 years he fathered a son in his own likeness, according to his image, and he named him Seth. The length of time Adam lived after he became the father of Seth was 800 years; during this time he had other sons and daughters. (Genesis 5:1-4, NET)

Read that passage very carefully. Adam and Eve are the parents of "humankind." Adam and Eve had (at least) 2 sons, Cain and Abel, in the first 130 years of their life. After Cain murdered Abel, they had a third son named Seth when Adam was 130 years old. Adam ended up living to be 930 years old. And during this 930 years they had other sons and daughters.

How many?

What were their names?

When were they born?

The Bible simply doesn't tell us. We can be sure, however, that Adam and Eve had a bunch of kids - both sons and daughters - during their lifetime. No other people existed on the earth because Eve is the mother of all the living. It is through Adam and Eve that more humans come into existence. At least, until their offspring start reproducing as well.

It is also important to note the way Genesis 4:17 records Cain's actions in the land of Nod: Cain had marital relations with his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch. (NET)

If we assume that Cain found a wife, we are again reading something into the text. Not out of it. The simplest explanation of what occurred is that Cain was kicked-out of the land of Eden, so he (and his wife) left for the land of Nod. When they got there, Mrs. Cain makes her first appearance in the narrative because her participation in the "knowing" that results in Enoch's conception and birth is pretty important.

Biblical narrative often leaves characters out of focus unless and until their appearance is necessary. For example, compare the following accounts:

Now when evening had already come, since it was the day of preparation (that is, the day before the Sabbath), Joseph of Arimathea, a highly regarded member of the council, who was himself looking forward to the kingdom of God, went boldly to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. Pilate was surprised that he was already dead. He called the centurion and asked him if he had been dead for some time. When Pilate was informed by the centurion, he gave the body to Joseph. After Joseph bought a linen cloth and took down the body, he wrapped it in the linen and placed it in a tomb cut out of the rock. Then he rolled a stone across the entrance of the tomb. (Mark 15:42-46, NET)

And:

After this, Joseph of Arimathea, a disciple of Jesus (but secretly, because he feared the Jewish leaders), asked Pilate if he could remove the body of Jesus. Pilate gave him permission, so he went and took the body away. Nicodemus, the man who had previously come to Jesus at night, accompanied Joseph, carrying a mixture of myrrh and aloes weighing about seventy-five pounds. Then they took Jesus' body and wrapped it, with the aromatic spices, in strips of linen cloth according to Jewish burial customs. Now at the place where Jesus was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden was a new tomb where no one had yet been buried. And so, because it was the Jewish day of preparation and the tomb was nearby, they placed Jesus' body there. (John 19:38-42, NET)

These are parallel passages about Jesus' burial. One account describes Joseph of Arimathea and makes it sound like he's alone. The other talks about Nicodemus. Is this contradictory? No!

John has a purpose for telling us that Nicodemus is there. Nicodemus played an important role throughout the Gospel of John. Mark ignores Nicodemus because if he mentioned him, everyone reading or hearing this account would of said, "Who?"

It's not sexist. It's a matter of relevance. We get details when they are necessary. It was true of Cain's wife (a female) and it was true about Nicodemus (a male). It happens a lot in biblical narrative, if you're paying close attention.

Mrs. Cain did not need to be a part of the story until Cain (and his bride) found themselves in Nod. Once she was relevant to the story being told the narrator tells us about her. If we were to ask the narrator - Moses - the same question: Where did Cain's wife come from?, I am inclined to believe that he would answer, "I already told you that Eve was the mother of all the living... she came from Eve just like everyone else!"

There is a final objection to this response that wasn't explicitly raised but often comes up: Mrs. Cain couldn't be Cain's wife because God said you can't marry your sister!

But this is an anachronism. The Law to which these objectors refer is thousands of years away from being given to Moses. If God intended for Adam and Eve to really be the parents of humanity, He would have expected that their offspring would have continued to reproduce with each other.

The genetic problems that arise as a result of persons too close in lineage reproducing wouldn't have affected them.

Anyway, I hope this helps clarify where Mrs. Cain came from!

Comments

Popular Posts

Prayer vs. Petition

Q: What's the difference between prayer and petition? Phil 4:6 for example.

A: An excellent word study question! When attempting to study words from the text it is necessary to analyze the word being studied in the original language (in this case Greek) as attempting to look up the words in English will often produce erroneous results.

For example, in English the word petition has within its range of meanings things that are certainly not within the scope of meanings for the Greek word (i.e. “a sheet that is signed to demonstrate agreement with some principle or desire for some social action to be taken” is part of the range of “petition” but not of the Greek deesis from which “petition” is translated).

The word most commonly translated as “prayer” in our English Bibles is proseuche, which appears 36 times in the New Testament (NT) in one form or another (for the purposes of this study, we are only examining the usage of these words as nouns – the verbal forms will not be included…

10 Things An Evangelist Is Not

You've probably heard the term Evangelist before. Most people have. The term most likely brings something to mind. Sometimes positive. Often negative.

Does your idea match what other people think of when they hear the term evangelist?

More importantly, do any of these ideas match what the Bible tells us an evangelist is?
The truth is that most of the popular ideas about what an evangelist is and does are based on the culture, not the Bible. This is a problem.

The cultural idea of an evangelist is so popular that it is beginning to be used by companies. If you go to popular job sites and put the term evangelist into the search bar you will find many non-church jobs looking for evangelists. Many of these positions include the duties of spreading knowledge about a particular company, product, service, or idea.
The Bible tells us that Jesus gave some Evangelists for His church.And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers

5 Keys To Effective Witness

Content is important. But it's not the only thing. Some evangelistic methods are presented as if they are the perfect witnessing method. Some think memorizing a method and mechanically delivering the content means you have effectively witnessed.

Witness throughout the New Testament demonstrates this is not accurate. There is not a cookie-cutter approach that is applied the same way every time.
Content is extremely important. Without the right content our witness cannot be effective. Messing with the content of the gospel voids its power. For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not in cleverness of speech, so that the cross of Christ would not be made void. (1 Corinthians 1:17) Focusing only on content fails to recognize that we are not preaching to the air. We are preaching to persons.
To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak; I have become all things to all men, so that I may by all means save some. I do all things for the sake of the gospel,…

Lift Up The Son, Part 2

For whatever was written in earlier times was written for our instruction, so that through perseverance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.
(Romans 15:4)

(If you missed Part 1, you can read it here.)

The Apostle Paul quoted a verse from Psalm 69 before making his comment in Romans 15:4. When he speaks of whatever was written before he means what we have recorded in the Old Testament. He simply called them the Scriptures.

God inspired the Hebrew Scriptures, our Old Testament. Paul said they were written for the instruction of New Testament believers. Through perseverance and encouragement in the Scriptures we can have hope. The Old Testament is not supposed to be ignored by Christians.

As we apply this to our task of lifting up the Son, that in and through Christ our Father may be glorified, we encounter a word of caution.

It is easy to agree on the surface that the church ought to talk about Jesus. That's a given. But are we aware that not everyone means th…

Fullness By Design

My wife and I are expecting our 8th child this year. I want my children to grow to full maturity. That's not to say that I want to skip the fun things that accompany young kids. I don't want to skip any of it. As each day passes I realize how quickly these moments are gone.

The march toward adulthood is inevitable. Every day, we all get older. I must be aware that my children are growing up, whether I like it or not.

But maturity is not the same as age. It is possible to get older while never really growing up.

When I say that I want my children to grow to full maturity what I mean is: I desire my children to realize their potential. I want them to grow into responsible adults.

I don't want my three sons to live in my house indefinitely. They shouldn't be expecting their mother to cook and clean for them into their thirties. Part of my responsibility as a father is to steward the children God has so graciously given us. We are to raise them so that they can be delivere…