Skip to main content

Angels & Demons Revisited

Angels and Demons
Q: Hi again!

I have always thought that demons were the fallen angels, but in Jude 6 it says:

[6] And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their own home—these he has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day. (NIV)

So, I'm thinking I was wrong because it says they are bound - so, what are demons if they are not angels, or are they?


A: This is a great question. We have attempted to address most of the main theories for who or what demons are in a previous post on demons. Those interested in our best attempt to answer the question, "so, what are demons if they are not angels, or are they?" should go and read that previous post first.

I like to see your theological reasoning in play and that you are willing to assess your previous assumptions (in this case, that demons are fallen angels). We all bring presuppositions to the text of Scripture that influence our reading. Not all of these assumptions are valid! Nowhere in the biblical text, that I'm aware of, is an explicit reference made that says demons are fallen angels. However, this idea is firmly embedded in our culture. If you do make that assumption, there are several verses that sure seem to indicate demons are fallen angels.

If you've read through the previous post, you'll see that I do not take the position that demons are fallen angels. The reason that I came to that conclusion is based (in part) on what comes a few verses later in Jude 8-10. I'll admit, however, that this conclusion is speculative. Without the Bible being explicit, we must hold our theological conclusions lightly. We don't want to go beyond what is written and begin abusing each other and fighting over disputable matters in direct violation of the command of the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 4:6).

Statue of an angel
Since we've already examined the main theories for the identity of demons in the past, this post will focus on your theological process which led to the question: that demons can't be fallen angels (or can they?) because Jude 6 says the fallen angels were bound.

But is that what Jude 6 says?

The translation of this particular verse reads slightly differently if you compare translations, which is always a good study technique to alert you to difficulties or possible translational problems in the text. Digging into this verse a little bit will show that the reference to angels is modified by a descriptive relative clause: "the ones who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their own home." It's these specific angels just described whom God has "kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day."

One possible interpretation is that Jude is describing all angels who fell when he provides this relative clause about their abandoning their positions of authority. In fact, some would even point to this as a proof text that the angels rebelled against God and fell with Satan. If this is true, then your reasoning seems to hold a lot of weight. Since these rebellious angels were then bound with chains until Judgment Day they cannot be equated with the demons which Jesus and the Apostles were consistently confronting and casting out from people on the Earth.

A different possibility exists. Perhaps Jude is referring to a specific group of angels through this relative clause. If so, he is intending to point the reader of his letter to a smaller segment of the angel population. Not referring to all angels in general. If he meant all angels, he could have simply written: "And the [rebellious/fallen] angels ... He has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day." Of course, basing doctrine on what the Scripture does not say (instead of what it does say) is usually bad practice.

Nonetheless, this modifying clause about the angels to which Jude is referring provides us with some important information. First of all, Jude expects that his original audience is at least familiar with the non-canonical Book of Enoch, which he quotes from in vv. 14-15 (a citation of 1 Enoch 1:9). This is significant because the book of Enoch makes use of an interpretation that identifies the angels who left their abode as the "sons of God" referred to in Genesis 6:4 who came to breed with the "daughters of men." The resulting race from this angelic/human mix eventually led to "the Watchers" (e.g. 1 Enoch 1:5) and what we would call today, "demons." This possibility was discussed briefly in our previous post on demons (the "second possibility" discussed).

If that's too speculative, we can at least understand from other passages that not all angels are created equal. Not all contain the same authority. Michael and Gabriel are the only two angels specifically named in the canonical Scriptures. These two angels have a special status and place amongst the angels. Over the centuries various attempts have been made to describe the "angelic hierarchy." One attempt by Dionysius the Areopagite, which was expanded and explained in great detail by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa, concluded that the angelic host could be broken up into three separate orders. Each with three divisions. This explained the descending levels of authority. Likewise, there are varying levels of authority in the demonic realm in this view.

Whether or not we accept the conclusions of these particular church fathers, the biblical text does seem to indicate that both kingdoms -- light and dark -- have hierarchy, authority, and structure. It's entirely possible, therefore, that the angels Jude is referring to are those who held a higher rank and authority (and abandoned that authority). Lesser ranking angels with no authority in the angelic host have fallen and become "demons" as we call them. Spiritual beings that live and act in the human realm until Judgment comes (Matthew 8:29).

Fall of the Angels Fresco - Rome
All this to say, I don't believe Jude 6 gives us enough information to either agree or disagree with the idea that Demons = Fallen Angels. Ultimately, the Scriptures don't answer every question that we have (bummer!). But they do provide all of the information that we need.

We don't necessarily need to know what demons are or exactly how they got here. But we do need to know that they exist. We should be aware of their influence and doctrines (e.g. 1 Timothy 4:1). We can speculate and arrive at conclusions that are based on careful study of the Word of God and prayer. After that we must be careful not to be divisive over these conclusions. To be so is dishonoring to the Lord.

At the very least, we can be sure that at least some angels are currently held in chains awaiting judgment on the Day of the Lord. Jude intends for this to be an example to humans. Judgment is coming and no one who fails to believe in Jesus will be spared on that Day! Jude is not calling us to speculate about the origin of demons but to live soberly in the light of this truth that God is both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus (Romans 3:9-31). Jude is bringing all of this up because the believers to whom he was writing were failing to remain diligent in contending for the truth of the faith. They were allowing false teaching to creep in. This was destructive (Jude 3-4) because it led to people denying Jesus - a catastrophic error.

Let us live in the light of the truth. Jesus Christ is coming. He is the only King and Savior. As King, He commands that all confess their sin and rebellion against Him, confess that they are deserving of His condemnation as a result, turn to Him through repentance of their rebellion and in loyalty bow their knee to Him as King, and trust fully in Him and His work on the cross for the pardon of their sin. There is no other Name given to men by which we may be saved from the just wrath that is to come! Thanks be to God for His mercy and grace through Jesus Christ our Lord!

Recommended Reading

These two books are recommended if you want to study spiritual warfare and demons in greater depth.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Agreed in the "we won't always know everything"! I think that if I can expect my kids to be ok with the "you'll have to wait to know the answer to such-n-such", I can wait and glorify Him in the process of living on this earth! Thank you for the link to the other post as well...
Rita T
Joe K. said…
Rita,

Having children is a real lesson for us who are "children of God!" Our Father interacts with us in similar ways (albeit, He does so perfectly!) that we do with our own children... good analogy!

JRK

Popular Posts

Smoking Hookah

Q: This week a young Christian talked with me about the practice of smoking Hookah. They attend a church [which] is reaching out to the many Indian and Muslims in the surrounding areas. Their church also have several ministries that support missions in India and Arab countries. As they spoke with me they said that many of their Christian friends are smoking the Hookah. They said that they have been told that certain types of Hookah smoking involve no tobacco but are simply flavored water, other types of Hookah smoking do include tobacco but in a ‘more pure’ form than that of cigarettes that have additives. The Christians that they know of who partake in smoking Hookah do not feel that there is anything sinful in this practice and believe that it is just a part of certain cultures as a way to relax and socialize. Apparently during certain celebrations some of these culture groups get together as a family and include smoking the Hookah together as part of the festivities. These Chris

Christ Died For Our Sins

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3) The truth of the gospel includes this important phrase: Christ died for our sins . You've probably heard it before. Many times. Sometimes familiarity leads to a diminished sense of importance. The more you hear about something the more ordinary it may seem. Common. Ho-hum. Boring. But this truth is anything but common. Another difficulty arises with this truth. Beyond being common. It may happen in your ears without you even realizing it. When the truth is declared that Christ died for our sins, you may think you hear the truth. But what you really hear is a diminished version. A partial truth. Instead of hearing that Christ died for our sins you may hear a slightly different version of this truth. You might hear this: Jesus died for your sins. Do you see the difference? You should. These statements are similar. Both m

Prayer vs. Petition

Q: What's the difference between prayer and petition? Phil 4:6 for example. A: An excellent word study question! When attempting to study words from the text it is necessary to analyze the word being studied in the original language (in this case Greek) as attempting to look up the words in English will often produce erroneous results. For example, in English the word petition has within its range of meanings things that are certainly not within the scope of meanings for the Greek word (i.e. “a sheet that is signed to demonstrate agreement with some principle or desire for some social action to be taken” is part of the range of “petition” but not of the Greek deesis from which “petition” is translated). The word most commonly translated as “prayer” in our English Bibles is proseuche , which appears 36 times in the New Testament (NT) in one form or another (for the purposes of this study, we are only examining the usage of these words as nouns – the verbal forms will not be

The "Jesus Loves You" Problem

Q: I've encountered a lot of teaching and Christians who believe that saying, "Jesus loves you!" is a valid form of evangelism. Do you disagree with this? If so, why? It seems like a loving way to reach out and to encourage those who are not believers. A: What a great question! There are certainly a lot of materials and teachings that encourage Christians to use the phrase, "Jesus loves you" as an outreach and evangelistic tool. Much of this teaching that I've encountered emphasizes following the lead of the Holy Spirit. It claims that the Holy Spirit will often lead Christians to say this to non-believers to encourage them and try and lead them to a saving relationship with Jesus Christ. Fourth Year Ministries does not teach or endorse this as a valid evangelism strategy. That's not because we don't want it to be valid! Truth be told, we would love for this to be a good practice for Christians. It would certainly open some more doors for us. I

10 Things An Evangelist Is Not

You've probably heard the term Evangelist before. Most people have. The term most likely brings something to mind. Sometimes positive. Often negative. Does your idea match what other people think of when they hear the term evangelist? More importantly, do any of these ideas match what the Bible tells us an evangelist is ? The truth is that most of the popular ideas about what an evangelist is and does are based on the culture, not the Bible. This is a problem. The cultural idea of an evangelist is so popular that it is beginning to be used by companies. If you go to popular job sites and put the term evangelist into the search bar you will find many non-church jobs looking for evangelists. Many of these positions include the duties of spreading knowledge about a particular company, product, service, or idea. The Bible tells us that Jesus gave some Evangelists for His church. And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as