Skip to main content

Angels & Demons Revisited

Angels and Demons
Q: Hi again!

I have always thought that demons were the fallen angels, but in Jude 6 it says:

[6] And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their own home—these he has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day. (NIV)

So, I'm thinking I was wrong because it says they are bound - so, what are demons if they are not angels, or are they?


A: This is a great question. We have attempted to address most of the main theories for who or what demons are in a previous post on demons. Those interested in our best attempt to answer the question, "so, what are demons if they are not angels, or are they?" should go and read that previous post first.

I like to see your theological reasoning in play and that you are willing to assess your previous assumptions (in this case, that demons are fallen angels). We all bring presuppositions to the text of Scripture that influence our reading. Not all of these assumptions are valid! Nowhere in the biblical text, that I'm aware of, is an explicit reference made that says demons are fallen angels. However, this idea is firmly embedded in our culture. If you do make that assumption, there are several verses that sure seem to indicate demons are fallen angels.

If you've read through the previous post, you'll see that I do not take the position that demons are fallen angels. The reason that I came to that conclusion is based (in part) on what comes a few verses later in Jude 8-10. I'll admit, however, that this conclusion is speculative. Without the Bible being explicit, we must hold our theological conclusions lightly. We don't want to go beyond what is written and begin abusing each other and fighting over disputable matters in direct violation of the command of the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 4:6).

Statue of an angel
Since we've already examined the main theories for the identity of demons in the past, this post will focus on your theological process which led to the question: that demons can't be fallen angels (or can they?) because Jude 6 says the fallen angels were bound.

But is that what Jude 6 says?

The translation of this particular verse reads slightly differently if you compare translations, which is always a good study technique to alert you to difficulties or possible translational problems in the text. Digging into this verse a little bit will show that the reference to angels is modified by a descriptive relative clause: "the ones who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their own home." It's these specific angels just described whom God has "kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day."

One possible interpretation is that Jude is describing all angels who fell when he provides this relative clause about their abandoning their positions of authority. In fact, some would even point to this as a proof text that the angels rebelled against God and fell with Satan. If this is true, then your reasoning seems to hold a lot of weight. Since these rebellious angels were then bound with chains until Judgment Day they cannot be equated with the demons which Jesus and the Apostles were consistently confronting and casting out from people on the Earth.

A different possibility exists. Perhaps Jude is referring to a specific group of angels through this relative clause. If so, he is intending to point the reader of his letter to a smaller segment of the angel population. Not referring to all angels in general. If he meant all angels, he could have simply written: "And the [rebellious/fallen] angels ... He has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day." Of course, basing doctrine on what the Scripture does not say (instead of what it does say) is usually bad practice.

Nonetheless, this modifying clause about the angels to which Jude is referring provides us with some important information. First of all, Jude expects that his original audience is at least familiar with the non-canonical Book of Enoch, which he quotes from in vv. 14-15 (a citation of 1 Enoch 1:9). This is significant because the book of Enoch makes use of an interpretation that identifies the angels who left their abode as the "sons of God" referred to in Genesis 6:4 who came to breed with the "daughters of men." The resulting race from this angelic/human mix eventually led to "the Watchers" (e.g. 1 Enoch 1:5) and what we would call today, "demons." This possibility was discussed briefly in our previous post on demons (the "second possibility" discussed).

If that's too speculative, we can at least understand from other passages that not all angels are created equal. Not all contain the same authority. Michael and Gabriel are the only two angels specifically named in the canonical Scriptures. These two angels have a special status and place amongst the angels. Over the centuries various attempts have been made to describe the "angelic hierarchy." One attempt by Dionysius the Areopagite, which was expanded and explained in great detail by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa, concluded that the angelic host could be broken up into three separate orders. Each with three divisions. This explained the descending levels of authority. Likewise, there are varying levels of authority in the demonic realm in this view.

Whether or not we accept the conclusions of these particular church fathers, the biblical text does seem to indicate that both kingdoms -- light and dark -- have hierarchy, authority, and structure. It's entirely possible, therefore, that the angels Jude is referring to are those who held a higher rank and authority (and abandoned that authority). Lesser ranking angels with no authority in the angelic host have fallen and become "demons" as we call them. Spiritual beings that live and act in the human realm until Judgment comes (Matthew 8:29).

Fall of the Angels Fresco - Rome
All this to say, I don't believe Jude 6 gives us enough information to either agree or disagree with the idea that Demons = Fallen Angels. Ultimately, the Scriptures don't answer every question that we have (bummer!). But they do provide all of the information that we need.

We don't necessarily need to know what demons are or exactly how they got here. But we do need to know that they exist. We should be aware of their influence and doctrines (e.g. 1 Timothy 4:1). We can speculate and arrive at conclusions that are based on careful study of the Word of God and prayer. After that we must be careful not to be divisive over these conclusions. To be so is dishonoring to the Lord.

At the very least, we can be sure that at least some angels are currently held in chains awaiting judgment on the Day of the Lord. Jude intends for this to be an example to humans. Judgment is coming and no one who fails to believe in Jesus will be spared on that Day! Jude is not calling us to speculate about the origin of demons but to live soberly in the light of this truth that God is both just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus (Romans 3:9-31). Jude is bringing all of this up because the believers to whom he was writing were failing to remain diligent in contending for the truth of the faith. They were allowing false teaching to creep in. This was destructive (Jude 3-4) because it led to people denying Jesus - a catastrophic error.

Let us live in the light of the truth. Jesus Christ is coming. He is the only King and Savior. As King, He commands that all confess their sin and rebellion against Him, confess that they are deserving of His condemnation as a result, turn to Him through repentance of their rebellion and in loyalty bow their knee to Him as King, and trust fully in Him and His work on the cross for the pardon of their sin. There is no other Name given to men by which we may be saved from the just wrath that is to come! Thanks be to God for His mercy and grace through Jesus Christ our Lord!

Recommended Reading

These two books are recommended if you want to study spiritual warfare and demons in greater depth.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Agreed in the "we won't always know everything"! I think that if I can expect my kids to be ok with the "you'll have to wait to know the answer to such-n-such", I can wait and glorify Him in the process of living on this earth! Thank you for the link to the other post as well...
Rita T
JRK83 said…
Rita,

Having children is a real lesson for us who are "children of God!" Our Father interacts with us in similar ways (albeit, He does so perfectly!) that we do with our own children... good analogy!

JRK

Popular Posts

Prayer vs. Petition

Q: What's the difference between prayer and petition? Phil 4:6 for example.

A: An excellent word study question! When attempting to study words from the text it is necessary to analyze the word being studied in the original language (in this case Greek) as attempting to look up the words in English will often produce erroneous results.

For example, in English the word petition has within its range of meanings things that are certainly not within the scope of meanings for the Greek word (i.e. “a sheet that is signed to demonstrate agreement with some principle or desire for some social action to be taken” is part of the range of “petition” but not of the Greek deesis from which “petition” is translated).

The word most commonly translated as “prayer” in our English Bibles is proseuche, which appears 36 times in the New Testament (NT) in one form or another (for the purposes of this study, we are only examining the usage of these words as nouns – the verbal forms will not be included…

Christianity Isn't Moralism

Do this. Don't do that.

Shop here. Don't shop there.

This is acceptable. That is an abomination.

Don't get me wrong. Christianity does have a moral code. That's undeniable.

And that moral code is not popular. Not by a long shot. The Bible is clear that the moral code is contrary to the flesh. By definition it goes against the grain of fallen human nature.

But Christianity isn't moralism.

The moral code is not the end. It's only a diagnostic. The Bible calls for rebels against the King of heaven and earth to be reconciled to Him through His Son, Jesus the Christ. The Bible calls for people to turn from their rebellion and live for Him. This means that we stop pursuing the various lusts and impulses of our flesh. It means we start living in obedience to our King. We live for the glory of His name.

The diagnostic helps us to see that we are off track. But living according to some external sort of rules is not the end goal. That was the mistake the Pharisees made. Yo…

Hallowed Be Thy Name

Growing up, I said the Our Father prayer a lot.

A lot. Multiple times a day.It was part of my religious tradition. Most of the time, I mumbled it as quickly as I could.

For what it's worth, my Dad tried to help me understand that mumbling the prayer without understanding what it really meant wasn't the goal. He wanted me to understand it. He wanted me to mean it.

I remember sitting with him in the car one afternoon while we went through every phrase. He did his best to explain to me what the terms meant. Why we would say these things. Why it mattered.

It didn't take.

Although I became better equipped to describe the meaning of the phrases, I still mumbled them as fast as I could so I could move on to the next part of my day.

Fast forward many years. After being born-again by the grace of God I started to read my Bible. I desired to know God and His Word. I remember when I stumbled upon Jesus teaching the disciples to pray the Lord's prayer in Matthew 6. I was both excit…

Christ Died For Our Sins

For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures
(1 Corinthians 15:3)
The truth of the gospel includes this important phrase: Christ died for our sins.

You've probably heard it before. Many times.

Sometimes familiarity leads to a diminished sense of importance. The more you hear about something the more ordinary it may seem. Common. Ho-hum. Boring.

But this truth is anything but common.

Another difficulty arises with this truth. Beyond being common. It may happen in your ears without you even realizing it.

When the truth is declared that Christ died for our sins, you may think you hear the truth. But what you really hear is a diminished version. A partial truth.

Instead of hearing that Christ died for our sins you may hear a slightly different version of this truth. You might hear this: Jesus died for your sins.

Do you see the difference? You should.


These statements are similar. Both may very well be true…

Self-Centered Theology

I have a problem.

Maybe you do, too.

I bet you can at least relate.

I'm self-centered.

By nature, I think from my perspective. Often, more often than I'd usually like to admit, I pursue my agenda.

I like to do, what I like to do, when I like to do it, where I like to do it, how I like to do it, and with whomever I like to do it.

I think you do, too.

Sometimes we are good at hiding this self-centeredness. I believe that it is possible to have genuinely altruistic moments. Moments where we put others self-interest above our own well-being. Sometimes powerful emotions like love, hate, and disgust, can cause us to act contrary to our self-centered notions.

Sometimes.

As Christians, we are given the gift of God's grace through His Son, Jesus Christ. We receive this gift when we repent of our self-centered ways and trust in Christ alone. In the noise that is "Christianity" - if you take the time to really listen - you will often hear a false gospel that appeals to the …