Skip to main content

A Sure Faith, Part 1

History Matters

In a recent post, we looked at what believers should do since Christ is risen from the dead. But there are many who claim that the Resurrection never happened.


Some, like Earl Doherty, claim that Jesus never even existed, saying that He is nothing more than a myth. Others, acknowledge that Jesus was a historical person but deny either that He claimed to be divine, or that He physically rose from the dead, or both.

Does the historicity of the Resurrection even matter? Are the claims of men like John Dominic Crossan and Marcus Borg that the historical, bodily resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth is unimportant to the Jesus of faith acceptable? Is there even a viable faith, without a historical resurrection?

The answer to the question of whether or not the Resurrection matters is given to us explicitly in 1 Corinthians 15:12-19.

Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain. Moreover we are even found to be false witnesses of God, because we testified against God that He raised Christ, whom He did not raise, if in fact the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have hoped in Christ in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied. (1 Cor. 15:12-19)

The word in verse 17 translated as "worthless" is translated as “futile” in the NIV. “Mere delusion” in the Amplified Bible. “Useless” in the NLT. “Vain” in the KJV. There is no way around it: the Apostle Paul makes it very clear that the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth is the foundation of Christianity. Without it, our faith is worthless.

If Christ is not risen, we should find something else to do with our lives. The answer to the question of whether the Resurrection is fact or fiction is very important!

All of the various hypotheses - that Jesus was a myth or a legend; that He existed but never claimed to be divine; or that the resurrection was a historical event - exist to try and explain the phenomenon that is Christianity. Regardless of its origin, Christianity exists. People today believe that a man named Jesus was raised from the dead sometime between AD 30-33. These same people worship Jesus as God. So, what is the most reasonable thing to believe regarding Jesus rationally and historically?

On the surface, without examining any details, the Resurrection is the least plausible. Dead people don't come back to life. Especially not after a few days. Certainly, if the resurrection happened, it was a very unique event. One we ought to pay careful attention to.

Did Jesus of Nazareth Really Exist?


Truth
There are two possible ways to understand the proposition “Jesus existed.” Only two. That statement is either true or it is false. Jesus was a historical person. Or, He was not. There is no middle ground. The question is did Jesus exist or was He a merely a mythical figure?

The contention that Jesus never existed, that He was a myth, is a relatively new movement. This hypothesis can be traced back to two French philosophers in the 1790’s. Bruno Bauer made the first academic case in the nineteenth century. Perhaps the most well-known current proponent of the so-called “Jesus Myth” hypothesis is Earl Doherty. The first piece of Doherty’s “Jesus Puzzle” is this:

"The Gospel story, with its figure of Jesus of Nazareth, cannot be found before the Gospels. In Christian writings earlier than Mark, including almost all of the New Testament epistles, as well as in many writings from the second century, the object of Christian faith is never spoken of as a human man who had recently lived, taught, performed miracles, suffered and died at the hands of human authorities, or rose from a tomb outside Jerusalem. There is no sign in the epistles of Mary or Joseph, Judas or John the Baptist, no birth story, teaching or appointment of apostles by Jesus, no mention of holy places or sites of Jesus’ career, not even the hill of Calvary or the empty tomb. This silence is so pervasive and so perplexing that attempted explanations for it have proven inadequate."

This is quite a claim. But there are two alarming problems with this statement.

First, this is nothing more than an argument from silence. Doherty isn't arguing from positive evidence. He is relying on a lack of evidence that he deems appropriate. In his argument from silence, he rejects the testimony of the gospels. But these documents are historical documents. When he says there is nothing before or outside these sources that acknowledge a historical Jesus, he has acknowledged that there are sources that do claim a historical Jesus. He just disqualified them from consideration. After he excludes evidence that goes against his case, we are to consider the leftovers. When we consider what is leftover he finds a “pervasive and perplexing silence” from which he concludes that Jesus never existed. This is faulty reasoning.

Frankly, the silence shouldn't be perplexing. The silence exists because he silenced the witnesses before hearing the case.

A second problem with this assertion (that Jesus of Nazareth cannot be found either before the Gospels, or outside of them as a historical figure) is that it is simply false. It is either poor scholarship or willful dishonesty. I'm not sure which is worse. Neither is good.

Unlike Jesus, the historicity of the Apostle Paul is not in dispute by modern scholarship. Although some aspects of Paul’s life are in dispute, the fact that he lived in the first century and died in Rome sometime between AD 63-65 is accepted as a historical fact. Of the 13 epistles that are traditionally ascribed to Paul, only 7 are indisputably Pauline. Six of the epistles most Christians recognize as authored by Paul are disputed by some scholars. They believe they were written much later. The seven that are not disputed are: Romans, First Corinthians, Second Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, First Thessalonians, and Philemon.

Let's build on the foundation everyone can agree on. We’ve already seen from the indisputably Pauline letter of 1 Corinthians 15 that Paul thought the physical resurrection of Jesus was essential to the faith. This epistle was written and circulated prior to the Gospel of Mark. This is contrary to the assertion of Doherty. In fact, the earliest epistle written by Paul, was Galatians. This short book is dated to have been written in AD 48. That's only 15-18 years after the supposed Resurrection event occurred.

Keep in mind the context of this epistle to the Galatians. If Jesus really lived and was really crucified, then this event happened in either AD 30 or 33 (probably AD 30). After the Resurrection event, Jesus’ followers began spreading the good news. Paul began persecuting these believers. Something happened to Paul and he gave up persecuting Christians. Paul became one of the persecuted. He dedicated the rest of his life to spreading the gospel that he once persecuted. In Galatians 1:11-12, Paul says this:
I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not something that man made up. I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.

Continuing in the letter to the Galatians, Paul lays out a timeline of his travels and ministry. He says that immediately after his conversion he went to Arabia. Then back to Damascus. After 3 years he went to Jerusalem and got to know Peter and James. Then he traveled again preaching the word. After another 14 years he returned to Jerusalem because the gospel was in dispute. You can read about this council in Acts 15. This puts at least 17 years between Paul’s conversion and the time of writing this epistle. Jesus was likely crucified in AD 30, and this epistle was likely written in AD 48, a time period of 18 years.

Over these 18 years, Paul has been actively preaching the gospel. He's been establishing churches. Now, after the first dispute over the gospel, one of the churches that he established is falling for a false gospel. This brings about the historical occasion for the first writing, the first book, of the New Testament. It predates the Gospels. It is being written to people who lived during the time the events supposedly took place. The crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus from the dead would have been a modern and contemporary event to them.

And what does Paul say to these individuals? Eighteen years after the supposed events, in order to convince them of their mistake, Paul writes (Galatians 3:1),
You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified.

If Jesus of Nazareth never existed – if there was no such historical person – how could Paul be so foolish? Why would he think that this would be an effective argument? Can you imagine this being an effective means of persuasion if the Galatians read this letter and say, “Ummm Paul, what are you talking about? We didn’t see Jesus crucified. In fact, we aren’t even sure if Jesus ever existed!”

Myth or Reality?
The hypothesis that Jesus never existed can only be reached by suppressing a vast amount of historical evidence. Biblical and extra-biblical evidence. Although we have only considered biblical testimony so far, the conclusion of Edwin Yamauchi, professor of Ancient History at Miami University (of Ohio) is that we have more and better historical documentation for Jesus than for any other founder of a major world religion. Doctor Yamauchi says:

Even if we did not have the New Testament of Christian writings, we would be able to conclude from such non-Christian writings as Josephus, the Talmud, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger that: (1) Jesus was a Jewish teacher; (2) many people believed that he performed healings and exorcisms; (3) he was rejected by the Jewish leaders; (4) he was crucified under Pontias Pilate in the reign of Tiberius; (5) despite this shameful death, his followers, who believed that he was still alive, spread beyond Palestine so that there were multitudes of them in Rome by AD 64; (6) all kinds of people from the cities and countryside—men and women, slave and free—worshipped him as God by the beginning of the second century. (Yamauchi, JUF, 221,222)

The "Jesus as Myth" hypothesis does not stand up to scrutiny. I don't have enough faith to believe, against all of the evidence, that Jesus never existed. The most reasonable conclusion is that Jesus is a historical person.

In Part 2, we'll examine the second issue:

Did Jesus claim to be God?

Comments

Popular Posts

Prayer vs. Petition

Q: What's the difference between prayer and petition? Phil 4:6 for example.

A: An excellent word study question! When attempting to study words from the text it is necessary to analyze the word being studied in the original language (in this case Greek) as attempting to look up the words in English will often produce erroneous results.

For example, in English the word petition has within its range of meanings things that are certainly not within the scope of meanings for the Greek word (i.e. “a sheet that is signed to demonstrate agreement with some principle or desire for some social action to be taken” is part of the range of “petition” but not of the Greek deesis from which “petition” is translated).

The word most commonly translated as “prayer” in our English Bibles is proseuche, which appears 36 times in the New Testament (NT) in one form or another (for the purposes of this study, we are only examining the usage of these words as nouns – the verbal forms will not be included…

What is Salvation, Part 4

Q: What is salvation and can you lose it?

There's the saying "once saved always saved". Using the scripture that no one is able to snatch them out of the Fathers hand. (John 10:29) but it says in verse 27 My sheep hear my voice, I know them and they follow me. So the no snatching is referring to those who hear and follow, in other words who are obedient to His Word. So, the ones that do not heed the call of the Lord and follow can be snatched?

What about sin hardening the heart? (Hebrew 3:13)

Shipwrecked faith? (1Tim 1:19)

I have heard the saying - "It's not how you start the race but how you finish it."

In Hebrew 3:14 For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end,

If you aren't a true follower of Christ then how can you have the strength on your own to even run the race. It is because of Christ and who He transforms you to be that you would even want to run the race at all. So…

The Judgment Seat of Christ

Q: If our sins are forgiven, what are we going to stand judgment for?
A:Part of the good news of the gospel of Jesus Christ is that "...there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus" (Romans 8:1). This is great news indeed! How amazing that the Holy and Righteous Judge and Creator of the world has made a way for rebellious and wicked sinners to be reconciled to Him.

Jesus the Christ, the one who became accursed by God so that all who believe in Him could be justly forgiven, and who rose from the dead and who is exalted at the right hand of God, has secured a victory over sin, death and the devil both now and forever. On the foundation of this completed work of Christ, believers can have assurance that they will be able to stand on the Day of Judgment. This is why it is good and right to sing the praises of Him who has overcome!

Because of what Jesus has done, the Bible teaches very clearly that our salvation is not on the basis of deeds, but on the basis of…

The Sign of Jonah

Q: Jesus Himself states, "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."

According to John 19:31, it seems as though Jesus died on the "day of preparation" which was immediately followed by the sabbath, and then followed by the first day of the week. This leads us to when Mark 16:2 happened, the ladies went to the tomb "very early on the first day of the week". It was at this time that the empty tomb was discovered.

My question is, according to history and maybe even Greek text, is there any explanation as to why Jesus said that He would be in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights when as I am reading the accounts, I am not coming up with three days and three nights?


Thank you, as always!


A: This question has been raised by many people. Numerous answers have been suggested. The reasons for asking this question are good ones. The r…

The Church Isn't A Business

I used to be a salesman. I sold a lot of different stuff. I worked retail. I did door-to-door. In all my various jobs my function was essentially the same. I was the link between company and customer.

Successful companies know their customer demographics. Many sales meetings revolve around numbers. Persons are treated as statistics. The customer becomes a set of numbers, preferences, and habits. Really successful companies cater their goods and services to a target demographic.

It's all about the consumer experience.
I remember when I began in pastoral ministry. People assured me that my experience as a salesman would be beneficial. They said there was a lot of overlap between pastors and salespeople. That may be true in our experience. But is it true of what we read in Scripture?

When I open my Bible and read about Christ's church I see a beautiful design that is very different from a business. Night and day different.

When Jesus walked the earth He rebuked those who failed t…